Jump to Navigation

Orange County CA Probate & Estate Administration Law Blog

Don't put assets at risk just to avoid probate in California

Creating estate plans that help keep as many assets out of probate is often the goal of a testator. The probate process can take some time, and having some immediately available assets is often very helpful. Paying for funeral costs is one reason parents may want their kids to have access to liquid funds. What about opening up a joint bank account? Joint accounts are a big part of estate planning for married couples; why not open one up with a child?

Opening up a joint bank account with a child is one way to help keep assets out of probate, but there are very real risks associated with doing so. One of them: it leaves your assets up for grabs to creditors.

It's your estate plan, but an executor administers it

Estate planning is a huge part of life for many people, but the truth is that most of the estate disputes that arise involving the plans we laid out occur after we are not there to clarify our intentions or provide direction to our loved ones whether due to incapacity or inevitable death. Estate plans are the legacy of one person but are left for others to carry out.

With that thought in mind, there are a few things that a person can do to make carrying out those plans a little bit easier for the executor of the estate whether that be a loved one or an attorney in Orange County. The first helpful hint: name an executor and make sure that trusted person understands and accepts the responsibility. 

What are the purposes of various trusts in estate planning? Part 2

Last week in our Costa Mesa Probate and Estate Administration Blog, we focused on trusts. We shared the two most basic types of trusts: living trusts that are created during an individual’s life and testamentary trusts that are created upon death, often in the terms of a will. The first post of this two-part series also focused on the parties in play in a trust arrangement.

Disputes involving a trust most often arise in the administration of a trust. For example a trustee may be accused of failing in their fiduciary duty to the beneficiary, there may be a dispute over what the language of the terms means for administration or a government agency such as the IRS may raise an issue with the trust itself. Every choice made in structuring a trust matters. So what are some of the most common structures?

What are the purposes of various trusts in estate planning? Part 1

If you're new to estate planning and probate, you have probably heard of a dizzying array of trusts available for a wide variety of purposes. Some are intended to allow assets to pass to beneficiaries without probate, and to provide certain tax advantages. Others can be set up to protect children or dependent adults with special needs, or to avoid having to draw down all of a couple's assets when one of them has expensive medical needs.

When trusts are thoughtfully designed and managed well, they can achieve important goals and provide many advantages. When they are not, trust disputes between trustees and beneficiaries or between those depending on the trust and the IRS, state taxing authorities and even federal agencies such as Medicaid.

In this two-part post, we will give a simple description of the purpose of some trusts and their main purposes. This is not intended to be legal or tax advice; you should discuss your individual situation with an estate planning lawyer or financial advisor before making any decisions.

To begin, think of a trust as an agreement with three parties. The person who created and funded the trust is called a "settlor" in California, but you may also hear the terms "grantor" or "trustor." The second party is the beneficiary or beneficiaries of the trust. The third party is the trustee.

Protect your kids' best interests with solid estate planning

For most of us, it's easy in life to assume that our daily routine will carry over to the next 24 hours, perhaps broken up by the occasional family gathering or maybe even a vacation. But that comfortable regularity shouldn't mask the reality that life is often unpredictable. People need to plan for the unknown.

In California, if a parent dies unexpectedly, children don't automatically receive the parent's retirement savings or life insurance payments. Those funds, if not otherwise determined in a comprehensive estate plan, have to be accessed by an executor with the permission of a court. If you create a trust, though, the named trustee can access the money without having to get court approval.

Larry Hagman estate wins probate dispute over adverse possession

Like many landowners large and small, Larry Hagman, TV's "J.R. Ewing," decided to build a fence on his 30-acre estate in Ojai, California. And, as commonly happens, he misunderstood the legal boundaries and accidentally fenced in and improved a small portion of his neighbor's land. As it happened, his neighbor was a religious nonprofit founded to continue the work of Indian mystic Meher Baba who taught that he had come into the world to "sow the seed of love in your hearts."

In 2011, the issue embroiled the neighbors in a lawsuit, which hadn't been concluded when the actor died in Nov. 2012 at the age of 81. It then continued as a probate dispute between Hagman's estate and the Meher Baba nonprofit.

Sassoon cut son, 3 beneficiaries from will 2 months before death

Just two months before legendary hair stylist Vidal Sassoon died of leukemia last May, he apparently disinherited his 41-year-old son and three former wives, according to Britain's Daily Mail newspaper. The stylist had an uncomfortable relationship with his son, whom he adopted at age 3 in 1975, and had been estranged from him for some time.

Including the 41-year-old, Sassoon had four children, one of whom predeceased him. His wife and the two other children, a boy and a girl, are expected to be his main beneficiaries.

According to the Daily Mail, Sassoon left a fortune estimated at £100 million, or about $151 million. Approximately $7.85 million of that fortune is located in Great Britain, which is why the details of his estate plan were released there. The remainder is still in probate in Los Angeles, where he lived with his fourth wife.

Mickey Rooney's home to be sold, fiduciary abuse issues unresolved

Former child superstar Mickey Rooney, now 92, is moving out of his long-term home in Westlake Village because his health no longer allows him to climb stairs. He has moved into the single-floor residence of one of his stepsons, apparently without his wife.

As you may recall, in Sept. 2011, Rooney and his attorney accused a different stepson and his wife of verbal and financial abuse and of withholding food and medicine from the actor. The couple is accused of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty related to the alleged abuse, during which Rooney claims they misappropriated his name and likeness, took control of his finances, and left him powerless. His attorney has now been granted conservatorship over the actor and is seeking a permanent injunction against the couple in order to protect him.

California taxpayers and financial planning for 2013

A large consideration in estate planning is the tax implications for any given year. This year appears to be particularly challenging for individuals living in California - especially those making more than $250,000 a year. There have also been more time constraints this year in the filing of taxes, and many taxpayers may simply not be aware of all of the changes that have taken place.

Depending on income, certain California taxpayers may receive breaks in one particular area whereas they may get hit with tax hikes in others. A worker's share in federal payroll taxes that was reduced in 2011 and 2012 will be returning to pre 2011 levels. Federal income tax rates for top earners have increased significantly, and capital gains taxes have increased as well. Investment income will also be taxed under new healthcare provisions.

Court overturns James Brown estate settlement; went against wishes

More than seven years after the legendary soul singer's death, James Brown's estate is still up in the air. After the estate had languished in probate litigation for several years and three trustees were dismissed for alleged mismanagement, South Carolina's attorney general at the time personally stepped in to broker a deal between Brown's beneficiaries. Now, that state's supreme court has overturned that deal -- and criticized the attorney general -- because the settlement would not have complied with the provisions of his will.

The Godfather of Soul wanted to leave most of his money to charity. Unfortunately, when he died in Christmas Day, 2006, it rapidly became apparent that no one knew how much money that would be, because the three trustees in charge of his trust had mismanaged it, apparently severely. Even the state supreme court couldn't determine how much the estate was worth. Its best guess was that it was somewhere between $5 million and $100 million.

When the attorney general brokered a settlement in 2009 between his widow, adult children and charitable interests, it was one of the ousted trustees, ironically, who called foul on the deal.

Email Our Firm

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Our Location

Bohm Matsen, LLP
695 Town Center Drive
Suite 700, Park Tower
Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Costa Mesa Law Office Map

Phone: 714-384-6500
Fax: 714-384-6501

Visit Our SSDI Site